By Kenneth Martin

I Have Been Listening To The Judge John Roberts, Jr.  Confirmation Hearing On Fox News. During The Hearing I Heard A Statement By Judge Roberts About Activist Judges. This Is A Sore Spot With Me, Because Of The Activist Judges, Especially In The United States Supreme Court, That Congress Has Failed To Protect The "We The People That Elected Them", By Impeaching These Activist Judges. That Is The Reason For This Article.

The United States Congress Is Not Doing Their Job To Remove Activist Judges. If Congress Is To Be The Voice Of The People, Then They Sure Better Correct The Problem, Or Be Removed From Serving The People.

"My Article"

United States Constitution

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Article I

Section 1. All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

Judge John Roberts, Jr.  Confirmation Hearing
&
Activist Judges

We The People Of The United States Are The Law, And Our law Is Written In The United States Constitution. If We The People Of The United States Change Any Part Of That Law, Then We have our 500 Elected Civil Servants In Congress Change That Law In Writing, And add it To The United States Constitution. Any Judge That Will Not Serve Under, Or Apply That Law Written By Congress, But Does Rise Above The United States Constitution and Enforces His or Her Own Law That Is Not In The United States Constitution, Is An Activist Judge, and That Is Not In Good Behavior.

All Activist Judges, According To The United States Constitution Should Be Removed From Serving As Civil Officers Of The United States, By Impeachment. That Is the Will Of The People Of The United States, So Spoken and Written In The Law Of The United States;

The United States Constitution

And Voted On and Written Into Law By The Elected Congress Of The United States Of America, Comprising of The Senate and House Approx 500 Elected People.

Any Judge Of Any Higher Court Or Lower Court That Does Not Apply The Law Under The United States Constitution But Does Rise Above The United States Constitution and Enforces His or Her Own Law That Is Not In The United States Constitution Is An Activist Judge and Should Be Removed From Their position As A Judge.

The United States Constitution States These Facts To Be True, And Enforceable By The Congress of The United States.

It Is The Duty and Responsibility Of Congress To Remove Any Judge That Will Not Follow The United States Constitution. That Is, The Will of The People.

 And Congress Must Carry The Voice of The People and Speak The Voice of The People Into Written Law. Thus We Call The United States Constitution.

Any Judge That Will Not Follow The Law Passed By Congress, Has Become An Activist judge.

If Any Judge Highest or Lowest Feels a Bill Passed By Congress Is Not Constitutional For Any Reason, The United States Constitution Does Not Give Him Authority To not Follow The Law Just passed By 500 Elected Civil Servants Who are The Voice of The people.

The Judge must apply That law Passed By Congress Or Become A Activist Judge. He Can File A Complaint To Congress To Have The Law Reconsidered,

But In No Means, Or Any Way Whatsoever With No Exceptions, Does The United States Constitution Give A Judge Permission To Not Be Under The United States Constitution. There is No Place In The United States Constitution That Gives A Judge Authority To By pass The United States Constitution, and Rise Above The United States Constitution And Write His Law According To "His or Her Ideology Of Law".

Article II
Section 4. The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

Article III
Section 1. The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.

Article VI

All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

Article. II.

Section. 4.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Article III

Section 1. The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.

Section 2. The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;--to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;--to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;--to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;--to controversies between two or more states;--between a state and citizens of another state;--
between citizens of different states;--between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects.

In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.

The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury; and such trial shall be held in the state where the said crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any state, the trial shall be at such place or places as the Congress may by law have directed.

Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.

The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.
 

********

A Short Story

One time several church's purchased some land. The cost was very high, thru blood, sweat, and tears, and many people died. But the price was not to much to ask. You see, these church's wanted some land that they could all enjoy together, the Baptist, Methodist, Pentecostals, Catholics, Etc., and share this land one with another.

So to organize this land these church's wrote themselves documents to ensure an agreement between themselves in writing, and referred to this as their Law. They called it their Constitution. They appointed Judges over the land in case of problems.

Christians set up houses and business in their land. Over a period of time different leaders were elected and served their land. But somehow secular people, atheist, and people that worshiped other god's came into power and demanded their right. Soon the Church's God Jehovah was not allowed to be mentioned at the Land, His Holy Word Was thrown Out of The Christians land.

Eventually The Christians Rose Up. They Together Took Back Their Land, That Was A Christian Land And Always Had Been.

All The Christians Spoke With one Voice, Follow Our Christian Law,

The United States Constitution,

Or leave Our land. Serve Your Other gods, somewhere else but America, The Land Of The Free.

Free Because Of Christian Law

********

Priorities Of The Founders

The Intent Of The Christian Founders Is No Different Than Any Other Christian. No Matter Which Church You Worship God ( Jehovah ) In.

When The Founders Wrote The United States Constitution,

The Law Of God (Holy Bible) And God's Will,

Was First and Foremost On Their Mind, When They Wrote The United States Constitution.

To Make Laws To Govern Themselves With, They Each Would Have Sought The Face Of God (Jehovah) First As The Number One Priority, To Be Sure That Nothing They Wrote Would Be Against God's Will, The Holy Bible, And The Freedom of Christians.

God First (The Law Of God (Holy Bible) And God's Will), Then The Law (United States Constitution) To Govern Them By The Rule of Law, And In That Order.

There Would Never Have Been A Law Wrote In The United States Constitution That Would Contradict The First Priority (The Law Of God (Holy Bible) And God's Will).

********

(Research Notes)


One entry found for impeach.


Main Entry: 1im·peach
Pronunciation: im-'pEch
Function: transitive verb
Etymology: Middle English empechen, from Middle French empeechier to hinder, from Late Latin impedicare to fetter, from Latin in- + pedica fetter, from ped-, pes foot -- more at FOOT
1 a : to bring an accusation against b : to charge with a crime or misdemeanor; specifically : to charge (a public official) before a competent tribunal with misconduct in office
2 : to cast doubt on; especially : to challenge the credibility or validity of <impeach the testimony of a witness>
3 : to remove from office especially for misconduct
- im·peach·able /-'pE-ch&-b&l/ adjective
- im·peach·ment /-'pEch-m&nt/ noun


12 entries found for civil. The first 10 are listed below.
To select an entry, click on it. For more results, click here.
civilcivil deathcivil defensecivil disobediencecivil engineercivil lawcivil libertycivil marriagecivil rightscivil servant

Main Entry: civ·il
Pronunciation: 'si-v&l
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French, from Latin civilis, from civis
1 a : of or relating to citizens b : of or relating to the state or its citizenry
2 a : CIVILIZED <civil society> b : adequate in courtesy and politeness : MANNERLY
3 a : of, relating to, or based on civil law b : relating to private rights and to remedies sought by action or suit distinct from criminal proceedings c : established by law
4 : of, relating to, or involving the general public, their activities, needs, or ways, or civic affairs as distinguished from special (as military or religious) affairs
5 of time : based on the mean sun and legally recognized for use in ordinary affairs
synonyms CIVIL, POLITE, COURTEOUS, GALLANT, CHIVALROUS mean observant of the forms required by good breeding. CIVIL often suggests little more than the avoidance of overt rudeness <owed the questioner a civil reply>. POLITE commonly implies polish of speech and manners and sometimes suggests an absence of cordiality <if you can't be pleasant, at least be polite>. COURTEOUS implies more actively considerate or dignified politeness <clerks who were unfailingly courteous to customers>. GALLANT and CHIVALROUS imply courteous attentiveness especially to women. GALLANT suggests spirited and dashing behavior and ornate expressions of courtesy <a gallant suitor of the old school>. CHIVALROUS suggests high-minded and self-sacrificing behavior <a chivalrous display of duty>.





entries found for behavior.
To select an entry, click on it.
behaviorbehavior therapybehavior modification

Main Entry: be·hav·ior
Pronunciation: bi-'hA-vy&r
Function: noun
Etymology: alteration of Middle English behavour, from behaven
1 a : the manner of conducting oneself b : anything that an organism does involving action and response to stimulation c : the response of an individual, group, or species to its environment
2 : the way in which someone behaves; also : an instance of such behavior
3 : the way in which something functions or operates
- be·hav·ior·al /-vy&-r&l/ adjective
- be·hav·ior·al·ly /-r&-lE/ adverb



CIVIL OFFICER

http://www.lectlaw.com/def/c236.htm

CIVIL OFFICER - The Constitution of the United States, Art. 2, S. 4, provides, that the president, vice-president, and civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

 By this term are included all officers of the United States who hold their appointments under the national government, whether their duties are executive or judicial, in the highest or the lowest departments of the government, with the exception of officers of the army and navy. A senator of the United States, it was once decided, was not a civil officer, within the meaning of this clause in the Constitution.