WGNNews.org Commentary: By Kenneth
Martin
The two excerpts I have here are what concerns me on Islam
Religion in America. Is the Islam Religion in America only
peaceful because they are outnumbered so far in this country?
that the very sight of a burning cross
communicates a credible threat of bodily harm
Justice Clarence Thomas
Aren't you understating the effects ...
of 100 years of lynching?" he booms. "This was a reign of
terror, and the cross was a sign of that. ... It is unlike any
symbol in our society. It was intended to cause fear,
terrorize."
The
symbol and name Islam communicates a credible threat of bodily
harm all over the world. It is unlike any symbol in society and
it was intended to cause fear, terrorize, just the same as
the judge pointed out about cross burning.
Anywhere in the world, how safe are Christians when Muslims are
in control, they dominate?
Excerpt from WGNNews.org story November 25, 2002
The most difficult part of Islamic Law for most westerners to
grasp is that there is no separation of church and state. The
religion of Islam and the government are one.
Islamic Law is controlled, ruled and regulated by the Islamic
religion. The theocracy controls all public and private matters.
Government, law and religion are one.
Should Islam
Religion be allowed to grow within the United States? They are
not just a way of choosing how to serve their choice of
Religion. But rather they are building a Government that will
grow to become strong enough to,
Take Away The Freedom Of The
American People.
Thats because there is no difference between the government of
Islam and Their belief. The Goal of Islam is to take down the
American Government and to establish Islamic Control with their
Islamic Law.
How Safe Is America
From Islamics? How long Before America Will Be Islamic
Controlled?
Supreme
Court Dispatches
Virginia Burning
Are cross-burnings speech or violence?
Posted Wednesday,
December 11, 2002, at 3:21 PM PT
Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben
gets 10 minutes to defend the statute for the Justice
Department. He argues that a burning cross is not just speech;
it contains a threat of "bodily violence." Dreeben concedes that
the United States is not so happy with the "prima facie"
evidence clause of the Virginia law, which is odd if he believes
his own theory, i.e.,that the very sight of a burning
cross communicates a credible threat of bodily harm.
Out of nowhere booms the great, surprising
"Luke-I-am-your-father" voice of He Who Never Speaks. Justice
Clarence Thomas suddenly asks a question and everyone's head
pops up and starts looking madly around, like the Muppets on
Veterinarian Hospital. "Aren't you
understating the effects ... of 100 years of lynching?" he
booms. "This was a reign of terror, and the cross was a sign of
that. ... It is unlike any symbol in our society. It was
intended to cause fear, terrorize."
